UNCCD COP17 elevated land restoration, drought resilience and rangelands as economic priorities. But the failure to agree on a global drought framework means the biggest political test now shifts toward COP18 in Egypt.
ULAANBAATAR — The most consequential outcome of UNCCD COP17 may be a shift in how governments think about land.
Land degradation is increasingly being treated not simply as an environmental problem, but as a threat to economic productivity, food and water security, public finances and national resilience.
That shift was visible throughout two weeks of negotiations in Mongolia. Governments advanced decisions on rangelands, land tenure, science and implementation, while development banks, governments and private-sector actors announced new financing initiatives.
Yet COP17 also exposed the limits of multilateral consensus. Countries again failed to agree on stronger global drought cooperation, while several contentious issues were pushed forward to COP18 in Egypt in 2028.
The result was a conference that strengthened the economic case for restoring land while revealing how difficult the politics remain.
A new chapter for UNCCD
COP17 was the first COP under Yasmine Fouad, who became UNCCD Executive Secretary in 2025 after serving as Egypt’s environment minister.
Her background spans climate, biodiversity and development diplomacy, including roles as President of CBD COP14 and Egypt’s COP27 Envoy. That gives her a clear strategic opportunity: position healthy land as economic infrastructure underpinning food systems, water security, climate resilience and development.
UNCCD has historically attracted less political and financial attention than the climate and biodiversity conventions. Fouad’s challenge is to move land degradation beyond environment ministries and into the agendas of finance ministries, development banks and investors.
COP17 suggested that shift is beginning.
Land restoration is becoming an economic proposition
Approximately $355 billion a year is needed through 2030 to meet global land restoration objectives. Current investment is about $77 billion annually, leaving a $278 billion financing gap.
At the same time, land degradation, desertification and drought are estimated to cost the global economy about $878 billion annually, while the investment required to address them could generate roughly $1.8 trillion in annual benefits.
That changes the policy equation.
If degraded land creates greater economic losses than the cost of restoring it, restoration becomes less an environmental expense than an investment in productive infrastructure and fiscal resilience.
COP17 reflected that transition.
Governments, development banks, funds and companies announced a $1.3 billion portfolio for land restoration and drought resilience across 23 countries. The Asian Development Bank separately launched an initiative aimed at attracting at least $2 billion by 2035, while a new Drought Resilience Investment Facility aims to mobilize up to $400 million.
These initiatives were announced alongside COP17 rather than negotiated as collective commitments by Parties, but they point toward a broader shift from grants and pledges toward blended finance and investable project pipelines.
The challenge now is scale.
The implementation gap remains enormous
An IUCN assessment released during COP17 found that approximately 124.3 million hectares are under restoration, rehabilitation or improved management.
That is just 10.4 percent of the roughly 1.2 billion hectares countries have pledged to restore across major international frameworks.
The figure is not a scorecard for UNCCD alone, but it illustrates a broader problem: commitments have expanded much faster than implementation.
The world does not lack restoration targets. It lacks sufficient capital, credible projects, coordination and measurable delivery.
The next phase of the land agenda will increasingly be judged not by hectares pledged, but by hectares actually restored.
Rangelands emerged as an overlooked economic asset
Mongolia used its COP presidency to elevate rangelands, which cover approximately 54 percent of the Earth’s terrestrial surface and support around two billion people.
Initiatives launched around COP17 included a $1.2 billion portfolio spanning 45 rangeland projects.
The significance extends beyond pastoral economies.
Forests have increasingly entered carbon markets, corporate sustainability strategies and natural-capital accounting. Grasslands, drylands and rangelands remain comparatively overlooked despite providing water regulation, food production, biodiversity and carbon storage.
COP17 reinforced the case that these landscapes are not simply areas requiring protection. They are productive natural infrastructure.
A healthy landscape generates value. A degraded one creates liabilities.
Drought remained the biggest political shortfall
The clearest negotiating disappointment was drought.
Countries were unable to agree on the form stronger international cooperation should take, leaving the issue for further negotiations at COP18.
That matters because drought increasingly transmits across borders through agricultural markets, food prices, migration, energy systems and supply chains.
Governments routinely spend heavily after crops fail and water systems come under stress. Investments in soil health, water management and ecosystem restoration can reduce those eventual losses.
Drought resilience therefore increasingly resembles preventative infrastructure.
The question COP17 left unanswered is whether global governance can catch up with that economic reality.
Why COP18 matters
COP18 in Egypt in 2028 will be a significant test.
Drought will remain one of the most important unresolved negotiations. By then, governments and development institutions should also be able to show whether the financing initiatives launched around Ulaanbaatar have translated into capital reaching projects and communities.
COP18 will also take place as UNCCD approaches the end of its 2018-2030 Strategic Framework, giving the meeting added importance as Parties shape the Convention’s future direction.
Egypt is a fitting venue. The country and the wider African continent sit at the intersection of aridity, water scarcity, food insecurity, land degradation and climate adaptation.
There is also unusual continuity in leadership. Fouad will return to Egypt as UNCCD Executive Secretary after serving as the country’s environment minister and COP27 Envoy.
Her experience could help connect climate, biodiversity, land and development agendas that have too often operated separately.
But the measure of success will be delivery.
From Ulaanbaatar to Egypt
COP17 advanced three important ideas.
First, land degradation is moving from environmental policy toward economic and resilience policy.
Second, land restoration finance is shifting from grants and pledges toward blended capital and investable projects.
Third, natural systems such as rangelands are increasingly being understood as productive assets whose degradation creates economic liabilities.
Under Fouad’s leadership, UNCCD has an opportunity to push that argument further: healthy land is not simply something governments must pay to protect. It is infrastructure economies depend on.
By COP18, the questions should be harder: How much land has actually been restored? How much capital has reached projects and communities? Has private investment begun closing the financing gap? And can countries finally agree on stronger global drought cooperation?
COP17 moved land closer to the economic agenda.
COP18 will help determine whether the world is prepared to act accordingly.
Follow SDG News on LinkedIn
