America’s Disaster Agency Sounds Alarm While Other Nations Strengthen Climate Defenses

WASHINGTON — As the United States prepares to mark the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, more than 180 current and former employees of the Federal Emergency Management Agency have issued a public warning. In a letter to Congress and the FEMA Review Council, they argue that the agency has been weakened by budget cuts, stalled programs, and leadership turmoil, leaving the country vulnerable to catastrophic disaster.

The letter points directly at the Trump administration’s actions, accusing it of unraveling reforms put in place after Katrina. Those reforms, written into the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006, were designed to prevent the very failures that left New Orleans underwater and thousands dead. Staff now say the policies that required professional qualifications for senior leadership, insulated emergency management from political interference, and strengthened FEMA’s authority are being eroded.

Among the most pointed concerns are the absence of a Senate-confirmed administrator with disaster management experience and the imposition of new spending rules requiring Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to approve relatively modest expenses. Staff say this has slowed disaster response, including delays during the floods that devastated Texas in July. Programs such as hazard mitigation grants and Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, once cornerstones of national preparedness, have been frozen or gutted.

A Nation at Risk

The letter comes at a time when the U.S. is experiencing both more frequent and more intense disasters. Floods, fires, and hurricanes are striking communities with a force that scientists say is consistent with climate change. Yet FEMA’s workforce has shrunk by more than a third, according to the employees. They warn that without adequate staff or resources, the agency is increasingly unable to respond to overlapping crises.

The dissent also highlights the disproportionate impact on vulnerable communities. Indigenous, Black, Brown, and low-income groups face higher risks and fewer resources to recover, a reality made starker when government capacity is undermined.

A Global Contrast

The FEMA employees’ warning stands in stark contrast to developments abroad, where governments have moved to strengthen disaster resilience as climate risks grow. The European Union has increased investment in climate adaptation through its European Green Deal, funding local governments to build flood defenses and climate-resilient infrastructure. Japan, drawing on its experience with tsunamis and earthquakes, has adopted advanced early warning systems and community-based disaster risk reduction programs that are widely considered global best practices.

Small island states, often at the frontlines of climate disasters, are working with international partners to finance relocation plans, renewable energy grids, and climate-resilient housing. The Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility, launched in 2007, is a regional model of how pooling resources can soften the financial blow of hurricanes and tropical storms. Even developing nations such as Bangladesh have invested heavily in community cyclone shelters and early-warning systems, dramatically reducing mortality compared with storms of past decades.

By comparison, the United States is backsliding. The FEMA letter points to frozen mitigation grants, a shrinking professional workforce, and political interference, all of which stand in sharp relief to the global trend of investing in resilience before disasters strike.

Independence as a Solution

The letter calls for FEMA to be removed from the Department of Homeland Security and elevated to an independent cabinet-level agency. Employees argue that only then can FEMA regain the autonomy and authority it needs to respond quickly and effectively. They also contend that independence would protect the agency from political decision-making that slows urgent action.

For now, the warning reflects growing anxiety inside the federal workforce. Similar letters of protest have come from staff at the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institutes of Health. These letters paint a picture of career professionals watching safeguards and programs built over decades unravel.

Remembering Katrina

As the nation looks back on Katrina, the images of stranded families, overwhelmed hospitals, and an absent federal response still shape the country’s memory of disaster. The FEMA letter is an attempt to prevent history from repeating itself. With climate change accelerating, the stakes are even higher.

In much of the world, disaster preparedness is being recast as a central pillar of national security and sustainable development. In the United States, the very agency created to safeguard citizens is warning that it may no longer be able to fulfill that role.

Related Content: Europe Urgently Needs to Increase Its Disaster and Climate Change Resilience