Key Impact Points:
- $96.7 billion protected: The Biden administration has obligated 84% of Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) clean energy grants to prevent clawbacks by future administrations.
- Wide program coverage: Major programs like energy efficiency rebates and co-op clean energy initiatives have over 94% of their funding secured.
- Political leverage: Public announcements of the remaining $11 billion in funds create pressure to uphold commitments, especially in Republican states and rural areas.
High Obligation Rates for Clean Energy Programs
The Biden administration has safeguarded $96.7 billion in clean energy grants under the IRA by obligating the funds through signed contracts between federal agencies and recipients. According to Kristina Costa, Deputy Assistant to President Biden and Director of the White House Clean Energy Office, “This is all big progress and ensures that these investments should actually flow to communities and recipients as intended.”
By the Numbers: Major Program Allocations
- Department of Energy: 94% of $8.8 billion allocated to energy efficiency rebates for home retrofits and appliances.
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA): 97% of $9.45 billion obligated to help electric cooperatives procure clean energy.
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): $38 billion obligated, including 100% of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and 94% of all IRA grant programs.
While $11 billion remains unobligated, most of it is earmarked for future fiscal years, especially within USDA programs.
Political and Strategic Considerations
The Biden administration’s strategy ensures the continuity of clean energy projects despite the transition to President-elect Donald Trump, who has expressed skepticism about climate change and plans to rescind unspent IRA funds. Costa highlighted that public announcements of the remaining funds could generate political pressure, particularly in regions benefiting from these investments.
“Even though some $11 billion in funds are not obligated, the fact that they have been announced publicly creates some political pressure to not rescind those commitments, particularly in areas where those programs are going to Republican states and districts in rural areas and otherwise,” Costa explained.
The measures aim to maintain momentum in the clean energy transition while shielding projects from political reversals.
Related Article: Environmental Groups Swipe Left on Biden, Right on Harris for Climate
