Uganda’s presidential election on January 15 has left the country suspended between two stark realities. In one, President Yoweri Museveni has secured a commanding seventh term and projects continuity after nearly four decades in power. In the other, opposition leader Bobi Wine says the result is a manufactured victory, achieved through intimidation, ballot tampering, and a sweeping crackdown that transformed a national vote into what he calls “a political performance, not a democracy.”
The dispute now places Uganda at a critical inflection point, with implications far beyond its borders for democratic legitimacy, civic rights, and the future of governance in Africa
Speaking to Al Jazeera from an undisclosed location, Wine said his campaign has collected video and documentary evidence of ballot stuffing and manipulation by election officials.
“We have evidence of fraud,” he said. “We have videos showing officials filling ballots in favor of Museveni. This was not an election. It was a well coordinated operation to retain power.”
Wine also described a broader pattern of repression that shaped the entire electoral environment. He said his rallies were blocked, his supporters harassed, and his movement systematically targeted by security forces.
In a separate interview with the BBC, Wine sharpened his critique, arguing that the process was neither free nor fair.
“This was not an election,” he told the BBC. “It was a mockery of democracy. The Ugandan people were not allowed to choose.”
An election conducted under fear
Human rights groups paint a stark picture of the months leading up to the vote. Opposition gatherings were routinely broken up, journalists faced harassment, and dozens of activists were arrested.
Most strikingly, the government imposed a nationwide internet shutdown during the election period, cutting off communications and limiting transparency at precisely the moment when public scrutiny was most needed.
Security forces were heavily deployed around polling stations and in opposition strongholds. Rights monitors reported cases of excessive force, arbitrary arrests, and intimidation aimed at discouraging turnout among Wine’s supporters.
Museveni’s message versus the reality on the ground
President Museveni framed the result as proof of stability and continuity, portraying himself as a guarantor of order in a volatile region. His supporters argue that his long tenure has delivered economic growth and security.
But critics say this stability comes at the cost of democratic rights, competitive politics, and basic freedoms. They see the election as another milestone in Uganda’s drift toward entrenched one party rule.
Why this matters beyond Uganda
Uganda’s contested election reflects a broader struggle playing out across parts of Africa and the Global South. Young, reform minded movements are challenging long ruling leaders, while incumbents rely on state power, security forces, and control of institutions to maintain authority.
For international partners, the vote raises uncomfortable questions about governance, accountability, and the future of democratic institutions in Uganda.
A democracy at a crossroads
Bobi Wine has signaled that his movement will continue to press its case, both domestically and internationally. Whether through legal challenges, public mobilization, or diplomatic appeals, he insists the fight for Ugandan democracy is far from over.
For now, Uganda enters a new term under Museveni, but with a deeply polarized society, a battered opposition, and an unresolved debate about whether the ballot truly reflected the will of the people.
RELATED STORIES:
Follow SDG News on LinkedIn
