As power shifts in Caracas and Washington, the country’s forests, rivers and communities are being pulled into the center of a high-stakes reckoning.
CARACAS — Venezuela’s environment has long lived in the shadow of oil. Now it stands directly in its path.
The country is one of the most biodiverse on Earth, home to rainforests, wetlands and coastal ecosystems that sustain millions of people. Yet decades of fossil-fuel dependence have left those landscapes scarred. With political upheaval accelerating and international pressure mounting to revive oil production, Venezuela faces a stark choice about what kind of recovery it wants. This moment could lock in another generation of environmental damage or force a long-overdue reset.
Oil Beneath Fragile Ground
Much of Venezuela’s petroleum lies in the Orinoco Belt, a vast expanse where extra-heavy crude sits beneath rivers, forests and Indigenous lands. This oil is among the most carbon-intensive in the world. It takes more energy to extract, more water to process and leaves a far larger environmental footprint than conventional crude.
Years of neglect have worsened the toll. Pipelines leak. Gas flares burn continuously. Oil slicks seep into soil and waterways. Around Lake Maracaibo, pollution has become a fact of life, damaging fisheries and threatening drinking water in communities that once depended on the lake for survival.
The Cost of a Comeback
Calls to revive Venezuela’s oil sector are growing louder, framed as a necessary step toward economic stability. Supporters argue that foreign investment could modernize aging infrastructure.
Environmental groups are unconvinced. A rapid production ramp-up threatens to deepen pollution before reforms take hold. Heavy crude extraction would drive emissions sharply upward at a moment when the world is struggling to curb them. For communities living near oil fields and refineries, the debate is not abstract. It is about toxic water, failing crops and health risks that have accumulated for years without meaningful remediation.
Guardians Working in the Shadows
Despite political instability and limited resources, local environmental groups have continued to operate quietly. Scientists track deforestation and methane leaks. Community organizations document spills and advocate for clean-ups. Indigenous leaders defend ancestral territories against unchecked extraction.
These groups have preserved data, ecosystems and institutional memory in the absence of strong national enforcement. Their work has kept parts of Venezuela’s environmental story alive even as state capacity has eroded.
Machado and the Environmental Question
Opposition leader María Corina Machado has emerged as a central figure in Venezuela’s political transition, and increasingly, in debates over the country’s future direction.
While best known for her push to restore democratic governance, Machado has also addressed the environmental consequences of decades of mismanaged natural resources. She has warned that economic recovery built solely on oil risks repeating the same mistakes that hollowed out institutions and devastated ecosystems.
Machado has called for transparency in resource management, stronger protections for water systems and meaningful consultation with local and Indigenous communities. Her message has resonated with environmental advocates who fear that a rush to extract could sacrifice long-term stability for short-term gains.
Washington’s Shadow Over Venezuela’s Environment
The environmental stakes have grown sharper as President Donald Trump has publicly asserted that his administration is effectively “running Venezuela,” framing U.S. involvement as both a political and economic takeover designed to stabilize the country and unlock its energy potential.
Trump has repeatedly emphasized oil as the centerpiece of his Venezuela strategy, signaling that U.S. companies would play a central role in reviving production and exports. For environmental advocates, those statements raise alarms. The Trump administration’s own record of rolling back climate regulations, expanding drilling and deprioritizing environmental enforcement in the United States has fueled concern that similar priorities could shape Venezuela’s recovery.
Local groups fear that an externally driven push to maximize output could further sideline environmental safeguards, weaken oversight and entrench a fossil-fuel model that has already inflicted deep ecological damage. The prospect of U.S. influence over Venezuela’s energy policy has intensified debate over who will set the terms for the country’s land, water and air.
Why the World Is Watching
Venezuela’s environmental decisions extend far beyond its borders. The country plays a role in regional climate stability and holds ecosystems that matter to the global fight against biodiversity loss.
Expanding heavy oil production would add significant emissions at a time when the margin for error is shrinking. How Venezuela proceeds will affect not only its own recovery, but also international climate efforts already under strain.
A Narrow Window
Venezuela is running out of time to decide whether recovery means reform or repetition. Environmental leaders argue that rebuilding institutions, repairing damaged land and diversifying the energy economy are not obstacles to growth but prerequisites for it.
Whether those voices shape policy will depend on political will, international leverage and the ability of local communities to influence decisions made far from their rivers and forests.
Later today, María Corina Machado is scheduled to meet with Donald Trump, a meeting that could signal how the next phase of U.S. engagement with Venezuela will unfold and how environmental priorities will be weighed in the country’s next chapter.
RELATED STORIES:
Follow SDG News on LinkedIn
