{"id":11523,"date":"2026-03-31T12:51:34","date_gmt":"2026-03-31T16:51:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sdgnews.com\/?p=11523"},"modified":"2026-03-31T15:31:21","modified_gmt":"2026-03-31T19:31:21","slug":"the-u-s-a-wont-be-there-to-help-you-anymore-trump-tells-allies-to-take-oil-as-global-order-frays","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sdgnews.com\/ru\/the-u-s-a-wont-be-there-to-help-you-anymore-trump-tells-allies-to-take-oil-as-global-order-frays\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018The U.S.A. Won\u2019t Be There to Help You Anymore\u2019: Trump Tells Allies to \u2018Take\u2019 Oil as Global Order Frays"},"content":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON \u2014<\/strong><\/em> The global energy system, already strained by escalating conflict in the Middle East, is now colliding with a political rupture among Western allies that could redefine the rules of cooperation in times of crisis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a series of extraordinary posts on Truth Social, Donald Trump urged countries facing fuel shortages due to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz to take matters into their own hands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cCountries like the United Kingdom\u2026 should build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT,\u201d<\/em> he wrote, adding that nations would \u201chave to start learning how to fight for yourself\u201d because \u201cthe U.S.A. won\u2019t be there to help you anymore.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The comments, delivered with blunt force and little diplomatic cushioning, mark a sharp departure from decades of U.S. security guarantees underpinning global energy flows through one of the world\u2019s most critical chokepoints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Breaking Point in the Strait<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Strait of Hormuz\u2014through which roughly a fifth of the world\u2019s oil supply passes\u2014has become the focal point of intensifying tensions following recent military actions involving Iran. Disruptions to shipping have triggered fears of supply shortages, particularly in Europe, where countries like the United Kingdom are already grappling with constrained fuel access.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s message was clear: the era of American-backed protection for global energy transit may be over.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done,\u201d<\/em> he wrote, before concluding with a stark directive: \u201cGo get your own oil!\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NATO\u2019s Article 5\u2014And a Question No One Wanted to Ask<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

What makes Trump\u2019s remarks especially consequential is how directly they cut against the spirit\u2014if not the letter\u2014of North Atlantic Treaty Organization and its foundational principle: Article 5 of the NATO Treaty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Article 5 enshrines the idea that an attack on one ally is considered an attack on all, forming the backbone of transatlantic security since World War II. While the current crisis in the Strait of Hormuz does not neatly fall under a traditional Article 5 trigger, the expectation of mutual support\u2014particularly in moments of strategic vulnerability\u2014has long extended beyond strict legal definitions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Trump\u2019s assertion that the United States \u201cwon\u2019t be there to help you anymore\u201d challenges that expectation head-on.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

For European leaders, the implications are profound. If access to critical energy supplies becomes contested and allies are told to act independently, the credibility of collective defense begins to erode\u2014not through formal withdrawal, but through political signaling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question now circulating quietly in diplomatic circles is no longer hypothetical: In a future crisis, would Article 5 be honored in spirit, or narrowly interpreted in practice?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Allies Push Back\u2014Quietly, But Firmly<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If Trump\u2019s rhetoric signals a retreat, the response from key allies suggests something deeper: a recalibration of alignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a follow-up post, Trump singled out France, accusing it of obstructing U.S. military logistics by refusing to allow flights carrying supplies to Israel to cross its airspace.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cFrance has been very unhelpful,\u201d<\/em> he wrote, warning that \u201cThe U.S.A. will REMEMBER!!!\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Behind the scenes, similar tensions are emerging elsewhere in Europe. Italy reportedly denied a U.S. request to use the Sigonella air base in Sicily for aircraft linked to operations in the Middle East. According to Italian media, the request involved bombers and was made without prior authorization\u2014triggering legal and political concerns in Rome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The episode underscores a growing hesitation among European governments to be drawn into a widening conflict, particularly in the absence of clear multilateral consensus or established protocols.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The End of Assumptions<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For decades, the implicit bargain of the global order has been straightforward: the United States secures critical trade routes, and its allies align strategically in return. That arrangement is now under visible strain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s posts do more than signal frustration\u2014they challenge the foundation of collective security itself. By urging nations to \u201cfight for yourself,\u201d he is effectively dismantling the expectation that the U.S. will act as guarantor of last resort.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The implications are immediate. If countries begin acting unilaterally to secure energy supplies\u2014particularly in contested waters like the Strait of Hormuz\u2014the risk of miscalculation rises sharply. What begins as an economic necessity could quickly spiral into direct confrontation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A New Phase of the Energy Crisis<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The crisis unfolding in the Strait is no longer just about oil. It is about power\u2014who exercises it, who guarantees it, and who is willing to act when systems falter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

European restraint, American retrenchment, and rising geopolitical volatility are converging into a moment that may define the next chapter of the global order. The question is no longer whether the system is under stress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is whether it still exists at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

RELATED STORIES:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n