Munich this year was about reassurance, but not comfort.
At the Munich Security Conference, the tone shifted markedly from last year’s sharp exchanges to something more controlled and deliberate. The change was not cosmetic. It reflected an alliance adjusting to political shock, strategic uncertainty, and the aftershocks of decisions made far from the conference hall.
From Vance to Rubio, a deliberate reset
The contrast with 2025 was unavoidable. Last year, Vice President JD Vance unsettled European leaders with a confrontational critique of Europe’s political and security trajectory, reinforcing fears that the United States was moving toward a more transactional view of alliances.
This year, Secretary of State Marco Rubio arrived with a different brief. His message emphasized shared destiny and enduring partnership. He spoke of the United States and Europe as belonging together, while making clear that alliance does not mean indulgence. Rubio criticized Europe’s energy and migration policies, warned against dependence and complacency, questioned the effectiveness of parts of the United Nations system, and stressed that Washington does not seek allies it perceives as strategically weak.
European officials privately described his remarks as a relief compared with last year’s tone. Publicly, they received them as a stabilizing signal rather than a full reset. The overriding takeaway was not unanimity, but continuity. The United States, for now, still wants Europe as an ally.
Governing after Greenland
The conference unfolded in the shadow of President Donald Trump and the unresolved consequences of his second-term approach to alliances. No episode loomed larger than Greenland.
Trump’s renewed push earlier this year to revisit U.S. control over Greenland stunned European governments and raised alarm across NATO. Although the proposal was formally set aside following bilateral discussions on the margins of the World Economic Forum last month, European leaders do not consider the issue closed.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made clear in Munich that Washington’s interest has not disappeared. Her remarks underscored a deeper unease. Even ideas once considered unthinkable can now return quickly to the diplomatic agenda.
That reality shaped the conference. Greenland was rarely addressed directly on stage, but it framed discussions about sovereignty, alliance trust, and the risks of internal disruption within the West.
Europe responds with capability, not rhetoric
European leaders used Munich to signal a more assertive posture. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans to deploy warships and fighter jets to the Arctic in 2026 as allies strengthen defenses in the region. He also called for deeper security-linked cooperation with the European Union, arguing that closer economic alignment in targeted areas would enhance collective resilience.
Across the conference, European officials emphasized that strategic autonomy is no longer theoretical. It is becoming operational, driven less by ideology than by risk management.
Ukraine and the limits of negotiation
Ukraine remained central to Munich’s security agenda, but the tone was more strained than in previous years. President Volodymyr Zelensky urged Europe to move toward a common defense policy, arguing that unity is the most effective deterrent against Russian aggression.
Zelensky also voiced frustration with the direction of diplomatic talks, warning that discussions about concessions too often focus on Ukraine rather than Russia. His remarks highlighted growing concern in Kyiv that geopolitical fatigue could translate into pressure on the victim rather than the aggressor.
An alliance recalibrating in public
The presence of prominent U.S. Democrats offering alternative visions of American leadership added another layer to the conference. For European audiences, these interventions were read less as immediate policy proposals and more as signals that the United States remains politically divided about its global role.
That division is now a planning variable. Europe is preparing for multiple possible futures of U.S. leadership, not just one.
Munich 2026 did not deliver grand declarations or renewed doctrines. Instead, it reflected a quieter shift. The transatlantic alliance remains intact, but it is no longer grounded in assumption. It is being renegotiated through capability, credibility, and caution.
This year, Munich was not about restoring faith. It was about containing risk, after a year that reminded allies how fragile even the most established relationships can be.
RELATED STORIES:
Follow SDG News on LinkedIn
